Well, since the 2008 election is only two years away, I thought it would be time to make a firm decision on a candidate I could support. Sure, we don't know who'll be running yet, but why let that stop us? Unfortunately, there's not a single standout as of yet. There are candidates I'll be more or less happy to support, but we'll have to see how things shake out. Here's my list:
Definitely not: Brownback, Cox, Giuliani, Hunter, Romney, Gilmore, Huckabee, McCain, Paul, Tancredo, Thompson, Gingrich, Hagel, Pataki. Anyone who willingly self-identifies as a Republican after the past six years has inadequate judgment to run a country.
Biden - Pushed the horrible bankruptcy bill. Forget it.
Clinton - I vowed not to vote for her two years ago because of her support for the Iraq War. It was politically expedient for her, and she thought it made her look tough. Now she's trying to squirm out of it without admitting she was wrong. She started a "listening tour" and when people told her they wanted her to admit she was wrong, she stopped listening. I do like how her mere existence enrages the right, however.
Dodd - Yawn.
Gravel - Who?
Vilsack - Yawn. Also, we've had enough DLC for now.
Richardson - Could be decent, but I'm uncomfortable with how he failed to challenge the 2004 results in New Mexico, when there was a lot of evidence of problems there.
Kucinich - Probably the most closely aligned with my beliefs, but looks like Gollum.
Edwards - Good potential. Did the right thing in not firing the bloggers when that racist bag of crap Donohue demanded it. Dems have to learn not to let people who will never vote for them dictate what they should be doing.
Obama - I like the way he isn't playing the Fox News game, and isn't taking the "apologize for everything" bait. I don't like how he's using GOP talking points like "Lincoln Bedroom," although it might be a signal to the Clinton camp to back off because he'll return fire in kind. And boy, the Fox News crowd is terrified of him. What I don't like is the emphasis on "faith," as if claiming a religious belief magically makes you a more moral, better person. It doesn't. Two words: George Bush.
I could also vote for Clark, Gore, Dean, and Feingold. Feingold was my first choice. I think that Dean's 50 state strategy was GREAT, and was the biggest reason we took the House in 2006. Carville was crazy to go after Dean last year, and it demonstrated Snakehead's waning influence.
Thursday, February 22, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Edwards - Good potential. Did the right thing in not firing the bloggers when that racist bag of crap Donohue demanded it.
And then canned them two weeks (one week?) later, when the spotlight was off.
Well, technically they stepped down. And they insist they weren't fired, so I'll take them at their word.
It's amazing what the right will make up, and how their continued flat-out lying and lack of credibility never gets them discredited in any way. There they are as always, showing up on cable news and Sunday chats.
Yes. The endless credibility given to the continually, demonstrably wrong does piss me the fuck off on a regular basis.
(No sarcasm or snideness intended, that's just the Arial 10 Black talking.)
How about Pelosi '07?
Post a Comment